Login to download the latest version of Mint and your favorite Pepper, purchase additional licenses, or post in the Forum. Don't have an account? Create one!

In Partnership with Media Temple

Mint Forum

Remove Search Engines from Referrers Pane?

Search engine results keep showing up in my Referrers pane, and adding them to the blacklist (Preferences->Default->Referrers) has no effect. (I’ve been trying for months. It has no effect.) At the moment I have referrers that include aolsearcht7.search.aol.com, search.alot.com, search.earthlink.net, search.comcast.com, and aolsearch.aol.com, among others. Last week I finally blanked my blacklist, and that, too, has been without effect.

Note that this has been discussed, kind of, when Mint customers have sought to overcome the problem of repeated, unwanted referrers by filtering them out. A specific mentioned problem is referrers from web-based mail services, particularly .mail.yahoo.com, which I’d *love to be able to filter out. But that’s a different problem. In any case, no solution was forthcoming at the time.

I’m running Mint v.2.16.

Could anybody suggest how I might go about getting rid of these? This problem really dilutes the value of tracking referrers.

i’ve looked around to solve the same issue and i’m not sure that i’m fully understanding the options. as i understand it, i would have to alter a .php file to tell the referrer pane not to count a certain domain like bling.com not to be listed as a new referrer.

i’m not very technical and i’m wondering if there is a way to add bling.com to some sort of list of options that will count bling as a place that shouldn’t be counted as a new referrer?

well i guess i’m technical enough, can anyone confirm that they added this sort of query to the engines.php file to eliminate bing.com from being counted as a new referral?:

$SI_SearchEngines[] = array
(
    'name'          => 'Bing',
    'url'           => 'http://www.bing.com/search',
    'domain'        => 'bing',
    'query'         => 'q'
);

does anyone know if the serps mint will recognize the bing search engine if the string has been added to the engines.php file?

Shaun Inman
Mint/Pepper Developer
Posted on Jun 02, '09 at 09:45 am

I can confirm that your addition to engines.php will work and will be available in an update shortly. Not sure about the SERPs Pepper though.

hey shaun, thanks for the lightning fast response. strangely, the addition did not work and i’m still getting bing.com in my new referrers pane. should i just wait for the update?

Shaun Inman
Mint/Pepper Developer
Posted on Jun 02, '09 at 12:24 pm

You should still see search referrers in the Most Recent tab but if recognized as a search they should not appear in the Newest Unique. That said, this addition to engine.php won’t affect previously recorded data.

Doug W
Minted
Posted on Jun 18, '09 at 03:11 pm

Any possibility the search engine logic could be extended to include foreign engines? For example, right now only google.com works. Would be nice to wildcard the .com

Shaun Inman
Mint/Pepper Developer
Posted on Jun 19, '09 at 03:47 pm

For example, right now only google.com works. Would be nice to wildcard the .com

This isn’t true. Foreign search sites are detected and reported. The url property in the $SI_SearchEngines array isn’t used anymore. Check your most recent searches. I just found a number of searches referred by google.co.uk and google.ca. If you don’t see foreign searches then you probably aren’t getting any.

Doug W
Minted
Posted on Jun 22, '09 at 03:24 pm

I can see the searches and the referrer includes a query string yet the referrer isn’t being flagged as a search engine and the search terms aren’t being extracted. Works fine for google.com but not for google.com.mx. Any ideas?

Shaun Inman
Mint/Pepper Developer
Posted on Jun 23, '09 at 06:04 pm

An exact, example url would help.

is it possible to eliminate any new referrer that has the term “search” within their domain?

Shaun Inman
Mint/Pepper Developer
Posted on Jul 24, '09 at 12:54 pm

Not currently, no.

You must be logged in to reply. Login above or create an account